This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
The alleged episodes took place at an ExxonMobil plant in Texas before the worker was laid off in retaliation for complaining, according to court documents.
The International Code Council's copyright suit claims damages to its revenue model. The startup says its searchable platform gives users "free, unfettered access" to law.
This is why giving your site teams access to the documents and drawings they need at any time even when you are not on site is so crucial. So you can quickly find yourself lost in a sea of disconnected information unable to trace and resolve constraints or find the information you need to raise or respond to a claim.
By Bruce Jervis It has long been controversial: Should design professionals be directly liable to construction contractors for deficiencies in the drawings and specifications? Contractors cannot recover in negligence from design professionals for economic losses caused by errors in the drawings and specifications. ” Read more.
If the design professional in a construction project approves a shop drawing that is contrary to the prime contract specifications, does the owner have a claim against the design professional either for negligence or breach of contract?
The claims were made by the contractor on its own behalf, as well as on the behalf of its subcontractor. The subcontractor prepared an additional 70 shop drawings for total of 1,650 additional hours for which it sought additional compensation. The claim was presented by the contractor to the DOT. Pass-Through-Plus.
One of my partners remembers hearing about a lawsuit involving a project architect’s and contractor’s use of someone else’s drawings. Using the designs of another without their permission can also result in a copyright infringement claim. Regards, Plan Shy. Dear Plan, This is a familiar situation where ethics and the law converge.
One of my partners remembers hearing about a lawsuit involving a project architect’s and contractor’s use of someone else’s drawings. Using the designs of another without their permission can also result in a copyright infringement claim. Regards, Plan Shy. Dear Plan, This is a familiar situation where ethics and the law converge.
One of my partners remembers hearing about a lawsuit involving a project architect’s and contractor’s use of someone else’s drawings. Using the designs of another without their permission can also result in a copyright infringement claim. Regards, Plan Shy. Dear Plan, This is a familiar situation where ethics and the law converge.
a publicly traded Brazilian mining company and one of the world’s largest iron ore producers, with making false and misleading claims about the safety of the Brumadinho dam including through its environmental, social, and governance (ESG) disclosures. Securities and Exchange Commission last month charged Vale S.A.,
In today’s ever-evolving insurance landscape, the importance of swift and efficient claim resolution cannot be overstated. Let’s embark on a thorough exploration of how Contractor Connection partners with the insurance industry, delivering a holistic, efficient, and dependable claim journey.
The owner of the Hotel is claiming that the $275 million building requires a complete demolition due to the omission of required reinforcement in the lower level concrete columns. But as of now, the owner claims that the building would collapse in an earthquake and the Harmon Hotel stands as the world’s largest billboard.
One area is ‘Visualizing Claims’. Nowadays a claim for a variation (and/or EOT) will include massive numbers of drawings, BOQs, complicated P6 schedules and often lengthy narratives. So, BIM-mers out there with a bit of ‘oomph’ give it a go and plant yourselves within your organization’s Claim teams.
This is often done to allow the LLC to draw off the profits from the project and then leaving the remaining parties to fund the project and claims that will arise. So there is nothing wrong with forming LLC’s as a project delivery vehicle. Ethics come into play when the LLC is deliberately underfunded for a project.
This is often done to allow the LLC to draw off the profits from the project and then leaving the remaining parties to fund the project and claims that will arise. So there is nothing wrong with forming LLC’s as a project delivery vehicle. Ethics come into play when the LLC is deliberately underfunded for a project.
This is often done to allow the LLC to draw off the profits from the project and then leaving the remaining parties to fund the project and claims that will arise. So there is nothing wrong with forming LLC’s as a project delivery vehicle. Ethics come into play when the LLC is deliberately underfunded for a project.
The club and ballpark are wholly owned by Howard Hughes Corporation, which claims this is the first minor-league ballpark in the U.S. On April 9, the Las Vegas Ballpark, home to the Las Vegas Aviators Triple-A baseball team, opened in Downtown Summerlin, Nev. to be built within a master-planned community.
Often, contractors will need to prepare “shop drawings” to show specific details of the work they are to perform. Such shop drawings also require that the contractor have a license to use the architect’s plans. Such a license is necessary if copies of the plans in any form are to be made and to construct the building from those plans.
Some contracts deem force majeure as a relevant event that may grant the contractor ability to file claims on an extended time needed to deliver their obligations under the contract. These claim disputes are common especially when it comes to unfavorable weather as the term is mostly vaguely defined. Deliveries. Decisions and choices.
The RFI process is an area rife with possibilities of delay and monetary claims if not handled properly. The process is an official way to make sure that the contractors involved have all the information necessary and that every bidder is pricing the exact same way.
Construction contracts include many documents other than the signed piece of contract including contract drawings, specifications and prevailing conditions of the contract. These are long documents which most parties to the contract ignore going through in detail.
The owner moved for summary judgment on the copyright claim on the basis that it had an implied nonexclusive license to use the drawings. Part of the lawsuit contained allegations by the architect that the owner and its new architect violated the architect’s copyright. The court held that the AIA contract did not apply.
One of the most common administrative mistakes contractors make that give rise to claims and disputes is failing to give their contracts a thorough read through, Navigant Construction Forum Executive Director James Zack told a group of professionals attending a webinar that WPL Publishing held last week.
Now, many in the industry will be quick to dispute the first claim. After all, most construction contracts are still based on drawings and there is a belief that ‘we build off drawings’. Yet it is undisputable, that a large percentage of those drawings are created in a model-based software.
As the court noted, Gensler could not sue under the Copyright Act because Stabala did not make or sell copies of any plans or drawings in which Gensler claims a copyright. This provision of the Lanham Act requires some fraudulent act to succeed.
According to the complaint, the defendant visited plaintiff’s office and obtained certain information and had a third party architect draw up plans based on that information, which were virtually identical to plaintiff’s drawings. The ultimate burden of persuasion on these two elements rests with the Plaintiff.
Examples include claim sponsorship and joint check agreements. The first case involved a prime contractor’s sponsorship of a subcontractor delay claim against the project owner. Sometimes, however, arrangements are created which involve three or more parties. This week’s cases provide two examples. Litigation ensued.
This approach is somewhat surprising considering that in most contemporary construction contracts PDF’s as the digital representations of drawings have often higher standing than model files or even DWGs. It is being treated as something one puts up with until something better comes along.
In a recent communication, OSHA cited as an example a program in which employers created a prize-drawing for all employees who had not been injured in the previous year. An increase in the number of OSHA retaliation complaints.
By Bruce Jervis Construction contracts frequently establish a procedure for the review of shop drawings and other submittals. Featured in this Week’s Construction Claims Advisor:Piecemeal Submittal of Shop Drawings Caused Slow ReviewOwner Recovers Both Liquidated and Actual DamagesCourt Addresses Delay Claim on Multiple-Prime Project'
Is it not a bit arrogant to claim authority to know, how to measure the maturity of something without the ‘thing’ ever successfully been delivered in the past, not on a significant scale, anyway? This is an extremely long bow to draw. And because they do not limit their evangelism to the territory of the British Isles.
In the letters, Barminco claimed the performance was in violation of the company’s “core values of safety, integrity and excellence.” ” Some of the miners reportedly were drawing a six-figure income from their work in the mine when they lost their jobs.
Some software providers claim their products work in the cloud, but those services might not be designed to take advantages of browser interfaces and mobile access. Or as one contractor recently put it, “I reviewed draw requests from 35,000 feet in the air on WiFi on a flight to China over Siberia.”
This is the safest way to keep your project and yourself protected from commercial claims. By documenting everything on a single source of truth you also ensure that your project manager can raise or respond to claims very quickly. Learn more: How to connect your Snagging & QHSE processes to avoid claims and regain control.
I have rarely read a construction blog post with as much power and impact as this recent Procore Blog post: Inside theRisks of Construction Drawings: The Case of the Hourglass , by Bridget Johnson. The sub responsible for the structural steel ignored the mark and showed standard joist girders on the shop drawings.
The Optional Reviewer can claim a step without pushing the Review forward, but additional permission controls have been added to allow Key Reviewers to edit the selected Optional Reviewer. Reviews | Add Optional Reviewers – For the Group review step, project administrators can add an Optional Reviewer as an additional reviewer group.
No, I am genuinely interested, how all the entities claiming to be doing BIM models built-off other parties’ 2D outputs are able to satisfy themselves that the 3D model is the accurate representation of the drawings. Not that it can’t be done, but is it practical? Are ‘spot’ checks really efficient? Are QA procedures really any good?
There are traditional, contract-regulated response-requirements set for many actions needed to be performed by various AEC-project participants (comments, approvals, claims, RFIs etc.) – yet no form of an MRT comes up ever as something architects would boast about. What about the AEC?
Featured in this Week’s Construction Claims Advisor:Insistence on Schedule Compliance Did Not Accelerate WorkLow Bidder Did Not Violate Anti-Bid Shopping LawSpecifications Not Rendered Ambiguous by Drawing Note' This was reflected in a recent New York case.
What happens when you have conflicting details on two different contract drawings? These questions and more are covered in a chapter on contract interpretation by attorneys Brian Bennett and Jonathan Blocker in an upcoming book on construction claims. Which one is the contractor entitled to rely upon? Read more.'
The buildingSMART alliance claims to have developed the ‘basis for true information interoperability with AEC’. It smells of arrogance to claim the right to force an entire industry to align with the rules that themselves are yet to be proven. The need to have universal standards for working in BIM has been identified long time ago.
The lender’s responsibility is to ensure: The construction loan is always in good standing The money that hasn’t been spent is still enough to finish the upgrades Draw disbursements are only released for work that has been completed. Learn more: The construction loan draw process explained. Lack of contingency funds.
It is the ‘drawing based’ approach that is causing us trouble. Drawing based is centred on the ‘projection technique’ (i.e. orthogonal projection – what 2D technical drawings are ‘made’ from) a risky solution that requires high level of skills from the operators. Drawing based is centred on the ‘projection technique’ (i.e.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 116,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content